Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Model Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question (TTMCQ) pada Materi Pancadharma

Mirrah Megha Singamurti


This study aimed to develop a Two Tier Multiple Choice Question Assessment instrument that is suitable for use in Pancadharma material and to find out the teachers and students’ responses to the instrument developed. This study was conducted using the R&D method applying the steps from Borg and Gall. The locations of the study were at the State Junior High Schools 1 and 2 Keling in Jepara Regency. Data collection used questionnaires, test, interviews and documentation. The results of this study exhibited that the TTMCQ assessment instrument developed for the Pancadharma material had 92.22% of content validation; the reliability scores were 0.754 for first tier and 0.826 for two tier; the power of distinguishing questions was categorized into a good category with the percentage of 66.67% for the main questions, and 46.66% for the reason questions. The difficulty level test indicated that 40% of the multiple choice questions were easy and 53.33% of them were medium, and 60% of the reason questions were easy, and 33.33% of them were medium. The teachers and students’ responses to the TTMCQ instrument developed in the form of multiple-choice multiple-level questions were more complicated than those of regular multiple-choice questions; the form of the questions was good and neatly organized; and the form of the questions was more about children’s responsibility in terms of thinking and solving problems. Thus, the TTMCQ instrument that had been developed was included in the appropriate category to be used as an assessment instrument of the Pancadharma material.


Assessment Instrument; Buddhist Education; Development Research; Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question; Panca Dharma.

Full Text:



Adodo, S.O . 2013. Effect of Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Assesment Items on Student’s Learning Outcome in Basic Science Technology. Ondo State: Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies by MCSER-CEMAS-Sapienza University of Rome. E-ISSN 2281-4612. ISSN 2281-3993, Vol No. 2.

Aikenhead, G.S., 2005. Educacion Cuinica, 16,3

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara

Borg and Gall. 1983. Education Research An Introduction. New York: Logman Inc

Chandrasegaran, A.L., Treagust, D. F Mocerino, M. 2007. The Development of a Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instrument for Evaluating Secondary School Student’s Ability to Describe and Explain Chemical Reactions Using Multiple Level of Representation. The Royal Society of Chemistry: Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Vol 8. No. 3, 293 - 307

Depdiknas. 2003. Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20 tahun 2003 pasal 1 dan 3 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional

Musfiqon. 2012. Pengembangan Media dan Sumber Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Prestasi Pustakaraya

Nofiana. Mufida 2013. Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi pada Materi Kingdom Plantae. Digilib UNS

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta

Tuysuz, Cengiz. 2009. Development of two tier diagnostic instrument and assess students understanding in chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay Vol; 4 (6) pp 626-631




Creative Commons License

INFERENSI by is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

INFERENSI IAIN SALATIGA p-ISSN: 1978-7332, e-ISSN:2502-1427

Indexed by: